Ships, Hardware, and the Cost of Moving Cotton
Archival Document Review
These 1855 documents differ from earlier years. Instead of long business letters, the file contains:
freight settlements
ship repair invoices
marine hardware bills
port charges
small supply accounts
voyage settlements
This reflects a key shift: Stillman’s enterprise had matured into a shipping-based export system.
I. Passenger Passage Inquiry (Jan 4, 1855)
Archival transcription
Wampsville, New York — Jan 4, 1855
Messrs Post & Ryerson
GentlemenI am desirous of procuring a passage to Havre about the first of February.
If you have a ship bound to the above port about that time please drop me a line by mail stating what time she will be ready for sea and what will be the price of first class cabin passage exclusive of wines & liquors.And much oblige
Your obedient servant
C. M. DeFerriero
Wampsville P.O.
Madison County NY
Interpretation
This document shows Stillman’s New York agents Post & Ryerson acting as shipping brokers not only for cargo but also passenger passages to Europe.
This reflects the broader Atlantic merchant shipping network that Stillman relied upon.
II. Antwerp Financial Settlement (Jan 6, 1855)
Archival transcription (summary)
Account statement:
Remittance on Strecker & Co. Antwerp
Gross amount: ƒ3583.84
Bank charges deducted
Remaining balance credited
Signed:
Aug. Nottebohm
Antwerp — Jan 6, 1855
Interpretation
This is evidence of European financial settlement of cotton shipments.
Cotton exported from the Gulf frequently ended in:
Liverpool
Antwerp
Le Havre
Stillman’s accounts were therefore reconciled through European banking houses.
III. Apalachicola Cotton Market Letter (Jan 8, 1855)
Archival transcription (key passages)
Apalachicola, Florida — Jan 8, 1855
We only received your favor of the 30th ultimo.
Had hoped for all — but wish for ships.
Cotton freights are easier when the river runs down.
Still an unmanageable river and much of the shipping idle.
Interpretation
This is a cotton market intelligence letter.
Important observations:
shipping demand fluctuated with river conditions
cotton freight rates were unstable
many ships sat idle waiting for cargo
Apalachicola was a major competing cotton port to New Orleans.
IV. New Orleans Commission Merchant Letter
Firm:
C.C. Bogert, Williams & Co.
Shipping and Commission Merchants
New Orleans — Jan 18, 1855
Archival transcription (summary)
We are in receipt of your favors and one to Mr. John Gale.
We noticed the announcement of the firm of Post & Ryerson.
The world is large enough and there is no other than friendly feeling between the two firms.
There never was a fairer opening in New York than now for establishing the shipping business on a permanent basis.
Interpretation
This letter is very revealing.
It confirms that:
Stillman’s New York partners were expanding shipping operations
the firm Post & Ryerson had recently reorganized
New York was becoming the central logistics hub for Gulf trade
V. Mobile Freight Correspondence (Jan 15–27, 1855)
Several letters from:
W. S. Charlock & Co.
Mobile, Alabama
Key statements
Freight settlements and balances due:
cargo charges
freight adjustments
captain’s settlements
freight markets weak
One letter notes:
Freight continues the same with little offering to any port.
The large receipts of produce in Louisiana have caused more firmness.
Interpretation
Mobile served as a transshipment port for Texas trade.
Stillman’s cargo often moved:
Rio Grande → Mobile → New York / Europe
VI. Merchant Supply Ledger
One sheet titled:
“To Chamberlain”
Items include:
rice
potatoes
onions
flour
oil
paint
candles
vinegar
coffee
sugar
cheese
butter
Interpretation
This represents general merchandise supplied to frontier markets.
Stillman was not only exporting cotton; he was also importing goods for:
Brownsville
Matamoros
ranch settlements
This was the classic frontier merchant exchange system:
manufactured goods in → cotton / hides out
VII. Schooner Florence — Ship Repair Accounts
These are the most important documents in the batch.
Multiple invoices refer to:
Schooner FLORENCE
Captain J. H. Woodhouse
Locations mentioned:
New York
Fairhaven
Brazos Santiago
Marine hardware invoices include:
Rigging items:
shackles
hooks
thimbles
top sail tack
stay straps
boom bands
mast bands
sail hooks
chain hooks
Heavy hardware:
crow bars
ice bars
anchor fittings
iron plates
Example invoice entry
Shackles
Hooks & Thimbles
Top Sail Tack
Pump Standard
Anchor Plates
Repairs on Crow Bar
Interpretation
This is a ship refitting bill.
Before sailing to the Gulf, a schooner required:
full rigging inspection
ironwork replacement
sail hardware replacement
deck fittings
Such repairs were usually done in northern shipyards.
VIII. Florence Port Charges — Brazos Santiago
Receipts from:
Brazos Santiago — Dec 22, 1855
Example:
To P. Moses
For stevedore services
$17.50
Another receipt:
schooner Florence & cargo
to Benjamin Moses
for storage charges
Interpretation
These show port handling costs at the mouth of the Rio Grande.
Key activities:
unloading cargo
warehouse storage
local handling
IX. Ship Hardware Purchase (Nov 12, 1855)
Receipt:
Schooner Florence
To Geo. W. Baldwin278 feet of wood
slabs
$17.00
Interpretation
Repairs likely performed at Fairhaven, Massachusetts, a major shipbuilding port.
X. New York Port Charge
Receipt:
Schooner Florence
Captain J. H. WoodhouseTo landing cargo at Brazos
$60J. G. Fox
Interpretation
This is a freight handling charge paid after arrival.
XI. Cargo Receipt (Brownsville)
One slip states:
Brownsville — Dec 1, 1855
Items:
1 keg butter
1 box potatoes
2 lbs tea
Signed:
C. Stillman
Interpretation
This is a small cargo or provisioning receipt.
Even trivial goods were recorded.
XII. Small Account (Dec 22, 1855)
Slip labeled:
Edmond Bill
Amount:
$14.50
Interpretation
Likely a local labor or supply account.
XIII. Brazos Santiago Supply Account
Items include:
bacon
soap
tar
salt
box axes
Total:
$14.50
XIV. Wood Purchase (Dec 11, 1855)
Entry:
Schooner Florence
To 278 feet wood
slabs
$17.00
Fuel or ship repair material.
Major Historical Interpretation
The 1855 documents reveal something extremely important:
Stillman had built a functioning shipping system.
By this year we see:
Ships
Schooner Florence
Captain
J. H. Woodhouse
Ports involved
New York
Fairhaven
Mobile
New Orleans
Brazos Santiago
Brownsville
Antwerp
Business components
cargo freight
cotton shipments
ship chartering
marine repair
port storage
merchant imports
What 1855 Shows About Stillman
Compared with 1850–1853:
| Earlier Years | 1855 |
|---|---|
| letters about trade | operational shipping records |
| frontier supply business | international export system |
| merchant correspondence | ship logistics & freight accounts |
By 1855 Stillman had evolved into something larger than a frontier merchant.
He was operating what we would now call:
A logistics network
linking
Rio Grande frontier → Gulf ports → Atlantic trade


.jpg)
.jpg)





.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)








.jpeg)

.jpg)
.jpeg)




